‘DANGEROUS’: Why I Refuse to Be GASLIT Into Silence by Britain’s Equality Watchdog

By Patrick Christys

Let me be absolutely clear from the outset: I will not be gaslit into silence.

Not by politicians.
Not by unelected bureaucrats.
And certainly not by the newly appointed chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, whose worldview I believe is not just wrong — but dangerous.

When Mary Anne Stevenson warned that talking honestly about migration risks “demonising migrants” and endangering social cohesion, what she was really saying was this: shut up. Don’t ask difficult questions. Don’t point out uncomfortable facts. Don’t connect policy decisions with real-world consequences.

That, in my view, is not leadership. It is denial — and denial is dangerous.

A Watchdog That Won’t Watch

The EHRC exists to protect the rights and freedoms of people in Britain. It is supposed to be fearless, impartial, and grounded in reality. Instead, we are now staring at the prospect of an equality watchdog that appears more interested in policing speech than confronting harm.

If the head of Britain’s human rights body believes that openly discussing the risks and failures of our migration system is itself a threat, then the institution has fundamentally lost its way.

Because here’s the truth that polite London circles don’t want to hear: words don’t make people unsafe — policies do.

Real Harm, Real Victims — Not “Rhetoric”

When critics like me talk about migration, we are not talking in abstracts. We are talking about victims with names, faces, and lives permanently altered.

Girls groomed and raped by organised gangs while authorities looked the other way, paralysed by fear of “offending communities.”
Teenagers sexually assaulted by asylum seekers who should never have been here in the first place.
Families traumatised by terror attacks carried out by individuals who passed through a system riddled with negligence and cowardice.

To suggest that highlighting these realities is “demonisation” is not just insulting — it is morally grotesque.

Who exactly are we supposed to be protecting by staying silent?
Certainly not women.
Certainly not children.
Certainly not Britain’s ethnic minorities, who are themselves often the first victims of lawlessness and failed integration.

The Cult of Silence Is Back

We have been here before.

Rotherham. Rochdale. Telford.

Time and again, authorities chose silence over safeguarding. Sensitivity over safety. And every time, the price was paid by vulnerable girls while officials congratulated themselves for being “progressive.”

Now we are being told — once again — that talking about migration is the problem.

No.
The cult of silence is the problem.

Gaslighting the Public

What infuriates people is not diversity. Britain has always been diverse. What infuriates people is being told that what they can see with their own eyes isn’t happening.

We are told:

Mass migration doesn’t strain public services — even as taxes rise and housing collapses.

Cultural tensions don’t exist — even as armed police guard Christmas markets.

There is no conflict of values — even as homophobia, misogyny, and religious extremism flourish in plain sight.

And when ordinary people object, they are smeared as “dangerous”.

That is gaslighting. And I refuse to accept it.

Equality Cannot Mean Selective Blindness

Here is the bitter irony: mass immigration from deeply conservative societies has, in many cases, made Britain less safe for the very groups the EHRC claims to defend.

Women.
Gay people.
Religious minorities.

Pretending otherwise does not make you virtuous — it makes you complicit.

An equality watchdog that cannot acknowledge this reality is not defending rights; it is sacrificing them on the altar of ideology.

Unelected Power, Unaccountable Consequences

Mary Anne Stevenson was not elected. The EHRC chair is not accountable to voters. Yet the influence of this role is enormous — shaping law, policy, and public debate.

That power demands realism, courage, and humility.

What it must never become is a platform for silencing dissent or labelling critics as morally suspect for refusing to ignore the obvious.

The Public Is Not Stupid

People know when they are being lied to. They know when elites live in a different reality. And they know when institutions stop serving the public and start lecturing them.

If those in charge continue down this path — dismissing concerns, attacking critics, and waving away consequences — they will only deepen public anger and mistrust.

And that, ironically, will damage social cohesion far more than any honest conversation ever could.

I Will Keep Speaking

So no, I will not stop talking about migration.
I will not pretend that policy failures are imaginary.
I will not apologise for standing up for women, children, and ordinary British people.

If that makes me “dangerous” in the eyes of an equality watchdog that has forgotten its purpose, so be it.

Because the truly dangerous thing is silence — and I refuse to be part of it.